Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The judge found that there was no evidence of malice produced by Wayfarer. That's a moral victory for Lively. Obviously not a huge financial one compared to what she was asking for or spend on legal fees, etc.[/quote] Yes, that's the part of his decision that would have been overturned on appeal, it's not even a close question. The case wasn't at a point where they would have had to provide such evidence, and he acknowledges that in his decision by saying there should be a hearing on that issue but they failed to request one. He wanted a decision that would have no precedential value and got there on malice by saying WF lawyers didn't properly request a hearing.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
