Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]One tiny thing I noticed in the decision is that Liman gives a laundry list of possible reasons a lawsuit could be dismissed as frivolous, including lack of personal jurisdiction, in pointing out that this is not grounds to deny application of 47.1 if the claim otherwise falls under 47.1. That hints at the Jed Wallace Texas case. That court isn't bound by this decision, but as there is little authority on 47.1 it will be interesting to see if they address it (no doubt Lively's attorneys will note it and run over there to file some kind of letter about it).[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
