Reply to Roe v Wade struck down

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Roe v Wade struck down"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://x.com/tessastuart/status/1849467400573387115?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg[/twitter]
[twitter]https://x.com/tessastuart/status/1849470122638909678?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg[/twitter][/quote]
And the couple was strapped with [b]$40,000 in medical bills.[/b][/quote]
And she never wants to get pregnant again for fear of this happening again, or something else terrible.

I read this whole article and had tears rolling down my face. My first was four when we took her to my second’s 20-week scan, and we discovered he only had one kidney. We were beside ourselves with worry and it ruined the next few weeks for us. He was fine, this is common, and he’s fine now. But for this couple to have done the same thing as we did and find no kidneys - Potter Syndrome - and have that only be the beginning of what will be a years-long nightmare - it’s unconscionable.[/quote]

Sorry, I just can’t get behind how a late term abortion would have made this situation better.  The baby, after 24 weeks, has to get an injection through the mother’s abdomen, directly into their heart to kill them. Then over the course of a couple days, the woman is dilated and induced and, if necessary, the baby is dismembered to fully remove.  Euthanatizing (and possibly) cutting apart a baby is just a no for me.  If the baby had a poor prognosis, its born and comfort care is given so the baby isn’t suffering.  If it isn’t legal to euthanize a live baby after birth, it shouldn’t be legal to do that to a viable fetus in utero. [/quote]

Please define “viable” for us?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics