Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I just saw Burke was also interviewed by Flaa. The Lively Slop Ecosystem World Tour. This was so predictable, I can't believe Lively and her team thought they could salvage something with 47.1.[/quote] Burke's interview with Flaa made no sense and was super weird. She complains that Lively is taking over 47.1 legislation in other states and boxing her out, is trying to take credit for the legislation in other states and is ruining Burke's "under the radar" strategy by during the legislation into just another "Met Gala" or "Fendi store" (she uses these specific terms which I found so strange, only someone who has followed this case closely on Reddit would understand the "Fendi store" reference). She also says that she doesn't want Blake associated with the legislation because someone last year told her that people view Blake as toxic like Amber Heard and she shouldn't want that sort of association with the legislation. But then she complains that her organization or an affiliated one asked Blake to record a video and write a personal statement supporting the introduction of 47.1 in NY state and Blake declined to do so. So which is it? Blake is trying to take over the legislation and put her name all over it or Blake is not being sufficiently supportive or willing to put her name on the legislation? She also talks about how her friends have been telling her bad stuff about Blake but don't tell her bad stuff about Baldoni. Are her friends... Reddit commenters? Because I feel confident based on what else she says that her friends don't actually have personal experiences with either of these people. So it's just based on gossip? It all feels circular and weird. Also Flaa is an atrocious interviewer. None of this is journalism. I guess that's why they call them "content creators." It is content. But not sure what else. I certainly don't feel like I learned anything or understand what is going on.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics