Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Burke is worried because Liman may find the statute unconstitutional, at least with respect to federal courts.  Seventh amendment requires that parties get a jury trial to decide damages.  Statute doesn’t address that and Blake is trying to get damages without a trial.[/quote]

But you don't address that by going on Megyn Kelly. And also, Liman could apply the 7th Amendment issues without finding the law itself unconstitutional. He could rule that the court is unable to apply 47.1 without a fact finder determining damages, and since all underlying litigation has been resolved, there is no opportunity to do this. This could limit the application of 47.1 in the future and influence how and when it is brought, but would not declare it unconstitutional.

And if that's your real concern, you make the exact argument I just outlined in an amicus brief to the court, citing legal precedence and making legal arguments.

You don't go on Megyn Kelly and Billy Bush.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics