Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It really doesn't matter to the legal case but that is embarrassing for Lively. Though one does wonder how "organic" it is that Flaa "found" the comment and then Burke ended up on Megyn Kelly.[/quote]

You have to be a particular type of moron to think that anything that is happening to Blake now is the result of social media manipulation or some type of smear campaign by WF.  Even if WF had been conducting some stealth campaign against Blake, in 2024 ([b]and there is, by her attorney’s own admission, no such evidence)[/b], WF would not have continued such a campaign once the lawsuit was initiated and certainly not three years later.[/quote]

There is evidence in the record of their team working with Sage Steele on talking points in January 2025.

Source for the bolded?[/quote]

You truly are a moron. That was related to Baldoni’s filing of counterclaims and general response to Blake’s lawsuit and NY Times article.  Nor was Baldoni’s website a “smear” of Blake, or for that matter, his litigation or state,Mets made about it by his attorneys.

As for the smear campaign that is alleged described in the  Complaint, her lawyers have repeatedly called it untraceable even after full discovery.[/quote]

I'm not going to call you childish names, but do you not know where the word untraceable came from? Wow.[/quote]

Different poster, but I call troll because you can’t be this stupid. What they assumed was happening was a bot campaign, which is I promise is you very traceable.

This is not high-level government ops. This was some dude from his basement being paid $90,000. I promise if he had deployed some sort of smear campaign, it would 100% be traceable. He said so himself when he was monitoring and saw someone messed with the wayfarer Wikipedia page and he said don’t worry, don’t do anything, everything is traceable.

Blake hired former CIA not Wayfarer. They thought they were going to find a bot campaign and they did not. They panicked and subpoenad over 100 content creators and found nothing there either. This was tens of million dollars into discovery so what were they going to say? Oops our bad? No they were going to say it was untraceable, but that’s just not how the Internet works.[/quote]

So you don't know where the term came from.[/quote]

To the PP: "untraceable" was a direct quote from either Jen Able or Melissa Nathan bragging about how they could destroy Blake's rep online without anyone knowing who it was. Their words.[/quote]

It's called puffery.  It certainly doesn't explain Lively's complete inability to turn up any evidence of an active smear campaign in 2024.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics