Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]One of the architects of 47.1 has come out against Blake, saying Blake’s weaponizing the law and shouldn’t get fees.[/quote]

Unclear. It's a screenshot of a private comment from a private but unverified account and that person's verified LinkedIn account has numerous supportive statements of Blake. She definitely hasn't come out publicly against Blake. I'm reserving judgment until Victoria Burke actually makes a public statement on the matter. It would be a 180 from her so if it's a real comment, she'll need to explain it.[/quote]

There’s enough chatter that maybe the media or someone will look into it. Not sure why Kjersti would lie about something verifiable.[/quote]

It looks like it has been verified -- she went on Megyn Kelley. I still find it weird because she's publicly been very supportive this whole time but essentially got outed from a comment on a private Instagram account that isn't verified (so basically forced to address it). I think it's chaotic and I wonder if something happened between her and Lively or Lively's team because I am not quite clear why she would withdraw her support now. It's not like Lively filed a different motion -- this is the same motion she filed last year that Burke publicly supported.[/quote]

As a JB supporter all I can say is wow.[/quote]

It makes it look like Burke's support was always fake because there's no good reason to decide suddenly to have the opposite opinion that she publicly expressed as recently as January. It actually makes Burke look like an opportunist.

People on Reddit are also saying that Burke supports Johnny Depp. I don't know if that's true or not.[/quote]

It’s actually pretty easy to explain imo. I said way back when that the women’s advocacy groups supporting Blake were more invested in protecting 47.1 than supporting Blake and that Justin was just collateral damage as far as they were concerned. Now that the judge is hinting that he’ll rule it unconstitutional, they’re turning on her in hopes of saving the law. They probably never believed in her but rationalized supporting her as for the greater good. But she’s never been a good face for this movement. Burke cares about 47. 1. That’s actually the most consistent piece of this puzzle. Hope blake is having the day she deserves.[/quote]

Yes probably this.  The way Blake is trying to use 47.1 in Texas is particularly egregious because the MTD there was based on lack of personal jurisdiction.   The law appears to be both overbroad and poorly drafted.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics