Reply to New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Once again, I dont really have a dog in the fight but there seem to be three things that could significantly impact ECNL at this point.

1.  If GA formed actual Academies like what MLS now Homegrown has done. If there were 10-12 true Academy programs in main metro areas, that would siphon off significant talent since most of those rosters on the boys side get into the 30 range

2. If GA stayed BY and then gave a bit of a choice to kids based on their birthdates. Yes some Q3/4 GA kids might migrate to ECNL as well but it potentially impacts the Q1/2 ECNL kids more.

3. If GA actually imposed more of a development curriculum as standard for anyone with a badge.  The critics of ECNL suggest they simply recruit away the top kids and never actually develop them. If this is true, and GA could actually develop kids they may, over time, start to catch up to the ECNL kids.

I guess you could add a number

4. MLSN continues to help leverage ECNL girls to GA with the boys system.

There might be more but this is the basic list I came up with.

To me the interesting thing is the money aspect of all of this. It was only a year or two ago that GA needed a decent sized loan from USSF but there is no transparency into ECNL finances. They could be in trouble as well and you wouldnt know until it was too late, sort of like the DA, which seemed like a combination of funding and really poor management from the governing body.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics