Reply to I’m 20w pregnant. My fiance told me he has herpes.

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "I’m 20w pregnant. My fiance told me he has herpes."

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Look, he chose actions that hid the truth. For years. Whilst banging and cunnilinging away.
Who wants to keep a baby daddy like that? 
Why have a spouse or live in like that?
What else will he choose to hide other things? 
And no, not everyone has HSV2. Under 20% of US pop and declining by age group. 
Not everyone has HSV1 either.
I don't. DH doesn't. Tested and rechecked because we have concierge doc and paid. [/quote]
Your personal experience does not  generalize  to the entire pop. SORRY.

And you also cannot read and are inserting  your own conclusions. [/quote]
You are the one inserting conclusions. He has two positive tests, one from years ago. He knew he had a contagious STD and chose not to tell his girlfriend. He got her pregnant and chose not to tell her. He proposed and chose not to tell her. I don't care that some percent of people have this disease. It's [i]my choice[/i] if I want to be with someone who has it, and he removed that choice. He committed sexual assault.

Knowingly giving someone herpes without their consent can be considered sexual assault or a criminal offense in many jurisdictions, as it violates the ability to give informed consent to sexual activity. Legal ramifications, including criminal charges and civil lawsuits, often stem from a failure to disclose a known STI before sexual contact.

Key Legal and Personal Considerations:
Legal Duty: Individuals with a known STI have a duty to inform sexual partners to allow them to make an informed decision.
Criminal Charges: Cases have occurred where failing to disclose herpes led to aggravated sexual assault charges.
Civil Liability: Victims may pursue civil action to receive compensation for medical bills, pain, and suffering.[/quote]
Again,  you cannot read information  correctly. That's not what was written. This is about the 4th time you've  been told this. 
Secondly, no,  there is absolutely  no legal ramifications  for  him or anyone  here. None whatsoever. Google is really not your friend here as you are taking specific instances and suppositions out of context,  well, because that  is how you read material.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics