Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Kilmar coming back"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Keep defending the wife beater, then wonder why you lose. [/quote] Keep beating this line of attack to death… It’s not working. [/quote] Who’s the current President? Worked. [/quote] The Kilmar story happened AFTER Trump was elected, dummy. Unless what you’re saying is that Trump won due to anti-immigrant bigotry. [/quote] Not just Kilmer. Liberals alway choose the deadbeats to rally behind then wonder why they lose. If you defended Americans as much as this loser, you’d win more[/quote] But you fail to understand is that we ARE defending Americans by defending the rule of law. [/quote] No, you’re defending someone that should not be here, and beats his Wife. Deep down, you know it’s wrong. [/quote] Of course I know that beating one’s wife is wrong. I don’t think anyone is defending Kilmar’s character. What Dems care about in this matter is that the Trump administration failed repeatedly to follow the law in how they handled his case and then lied about it. Kilmar today—me and you tomorrow. [/quote] Come on, PP, give me a break with letting MAGA wash your brain.[b] All we know is that his wife filed protected orders and then rescinded them. [/b]His wife has fought tooth and nail to get him back in the country and is standing by him. EVERYTHING ELSE THEY HAVE SAID IS A LIE. Pure falsehood. No, he doesn't have MS-13 tattooed on his hand. No, the trafficking charge was always nonsense. No, he had never even been to the area where the confidential informant - you know, the corrupt guy who was let go? - said he lived while in a gang. Everything is false. He was the primary caretaker of his disabled child. So yes, I do defend his character in as much as he has been innocent of virtually everything that has been thrown at him. And as for the domestic violence claim, wtf do we know about it? It is really rich to talk about this given what Trump has been CONVICTED OF.[/quote] So you’re ok with your daughter needing multiple protective orders, then getting back together with the guy? You’re ok with your Son beating his wife as long as "she forgives him"? WOW[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics