Reply to Supreme Court Sides With Wrongly Deported Migrant

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Supreme Court Sides With Wrongly Deported Migrant"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]For those that don't want to read, DOJ loses again with another trip to the woodshed to be spanked.

Will this administration and its supporters ever concede the fact that Trump is NOT a king?

Sad irony is that the DOJ was once considered the world's greatest litigation firm.  Today, it would get its a** handed to them by Jacoby and Myers.[/quote]

SCOTUS determines this not the appeals court.[/quote]

You are actually funny. So you’ll concede Trump is not king when the Supreme Court upholds the 4th circuit?[/quote]

I never alleged Trump is king so not sure where you are getting that from. ? The point is that this is heading back to SCOTUS and doesn’t stop at the appeals court, the same one that lost at scotus for the AEA ruling among other times they have been overturned.

SCOTUS isn’t going to mandate that the president engage in specific foreign policy acts and report that to a district judge. [/quote]

Good thing the judge didn’t require the president to engage in specific foreign policy acts then[/quote]

She absolutely did with her expansion of the definition of facilitate beyond its typical use in immigration aka dictating specific actions with the president of ES to effectuate his release, and for the court’s intrusive discovery mandates. Read the court docs - they are all online.  District judge can’t force any specific engagement with a foreign power as per extensive case law.[/quote]

The Supreme Court said the Executive had to facilitate Abrego Garcia's release from custody in El Salvador and to ensure that his case is handled as it would have been had he not been improperly sent to El Salvador.

What has Trump done to comply with that order?[/quote]

Read the case reports. The DOJ already outlined the streamlining they did on the US end if he appears at a port of entry. The whole battle is that the Judge is declaring that not good enough and wants Trump to act diplomatically. The executive is saying that’s out of bounds (not deferential to article 2 powers as spelled out by scotus) and filed an emergency stay.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics