Reply to SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Trump is officially standing by Waltz. But it’s still possible he’ll get Waltz to resign if the press coverage gets to be too much for him.

[twitter]https://x.com/aterkel/status/1904524959742845068?s=46[/twitter][/quote]

Hegseth is the one who added number of planes and positions, which is much worse than adding the wrong number. That’s classified info. [/quote]
+1 Chatting about this on Signal - very very very bad
Mistakenly adding a reporter to Signal/no one being aware of who was in the chat generally - very very very bad
Adding operational details like locations, timing, positions of military personnel to the chat - the goddamn worst[/quote]
How about making this decision to get around records laws?[/quote]

The Military Times newspaper has already pointed out that the yahoos on the group chat broke several laws.  This is very clear.  Prosecute Hegseth, Vance, Waltz, Gabbard, Miller, Wiles and co.  We're waiting.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics