Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "New opposition petition to the Maury-Miner boundary proposal from DME"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]At the meeting it was suggested that the 2027 timing was designed to let the new Miner principal have some time to get the bearings, as well as to allow there to be a few years of data on how the at-risk set asides are playing out at Maury before the WG begins. That makes sense to me, although I can also understand Miner parents' frustration. Miner parents understandably want fast action taken to improve Miner, although (weirdly) that does not seem to be in DME's purview with this boundary exercise. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
