Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://twitter.com/andrewfeinberg/status/1674482393430761482?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg[/twitter] [twitter]https://twitter.com/andrewfeinberg/status/1674482396383551489?s=46&t=kf1qYlCXQnKgUhJWEIu2vg[/twitter][/quote] I'm super skeptical about this story. [/quote] What aspect of that sounds unlikely? [/quote] The first clue is that his “sources” are talking about a superseding indictment in other venues, which is not a thing.[/quote] This is not some RWNJ. Those guys always lie. [/quote] I don’t know anything about the reporter. But his story doesn’t make sense from a legal standpoint, which makes me question his story and sources.[/quote] What would be the correct legal jargon for further indictments? Because we know some of his lawyers are in trouble, and we know there are charges against Trump unfolding in New Jersey. So…[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
