Reply to Marriage is a horrible deal for women

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Marriage is a horrible deal for women "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]The only math problem occurs if all women want to get married. Not settling means remaining unmarried and raising kids on your own if you want kids, vs. marrying someone unsuitable. I might say the top 10% of men are marriage material if I were feeling generous. Only 45% of Americans are married, so it’s not like it eliminates all marriage, just the lower quartiles.[/quote]

Your problem is not in misunderstanding math, it is misunderstanding statistics. For example, if you use a population of 100 men and 100 women who are actively seeking a mate of the opposite sex, we can assume that the 100 women would rank the men from 1st to 100th in terms of suitability for marriage. The men would do the same.

It is likely that the top 10 ranked women would pair with one of the top 10 ranked men.  If you are ranked the 90th women out of 100, you are very unlikely to get a top ranked man. But the only people that might care if the 90th ranked woman dropped out and remained unmarried are the men who ranked at or below her (from 90 to 100.) You are advancing the idea th[b]at all (or most) women have a chance with the "top 10% of men" which is not true.
[/b]
With this fact in mind, explain how the fact only 45% of Americans are married eliminates the lower quartiles. In the 55% of Americans you say are not married, you have material groups of people who cannot marry (e.g., they are too young to marry). Also, you have groups that wish to marry but cannot (e.g., the ratio of women to men where both are over 80 years old is about 7 to 1 so even if many 80+ year old women wish to marry (or remarry) they do not have the option.)

[/quote]

To [b]marry[/b] you are correct. To [b]reproduce with[/b] you are incorrect. A 99/100 woman can still have the baby of a 6ft doctor who speaks four languages, either via a one night stand or a reputable sperm bank. If you look at the category of women who only want to “settle” in order to have kids, they can get the kids of a much higher “ranked” male and never have to deal with the problematic behavior of a lower ranked male. [/quote]

It is truly dystopian and indicative of how toxic modern feminism is that DCUM now earnestly argues that the best way to propagate the human race is through artificial insemination and one-night stands.  Stunning.[/quote]

We get it, you're pissed than no woman has to put up with your sorry a** just because she wants to have kids in 2023.[/quote]

Women have been indoctrinated to be misandrists and most don't even realize and keep repeating dystopian talking points without any awareness or examination.

Like OP complaining about marriage being a raw deal, with one of the complaints being having to get pregnant.  No awareness that the main function of marriage is to procreate and raise children.    And even wanting a family they complain about basic biological facts as a "raw deal".   But it wouldn't be modern feminism without complaining about nature or reality itself. [/quote]

I guess where you’re sitting in the equation determines what you consider dystopian. That a woman should be encouraged to have children with an unsuitable man strikes me as dystopian.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics