Reply to Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Insurrection Hearings 6/28 and beyond"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/04/26/pence-car-raskin-comments/

According to this, Tony Oronato’s actions that day are of great interest to the committee. And Pence knew not to trust certain agents that day.

It’s very strange for a USS member to become political staff also.

[/quote]

Extremely odd.

Also he lied about another witness’s testimony regarding LaFayette square.  It’s interesting for sure how much rests on this guy’s knowledge and actions.  But to be sure, if he isn’t truthful, it will all come out anyway.[/quote]
Aren’t there two other people stating she lied as well?[/quote]

No.  There is a report from an anonymous source.  Not even names attached, much less sworn testimony.  She had no reason to make it up.  It’s not even the important part of her testimony.

I think the most important part of her testimony is the bit about him knowing the crowd was armed and heading to the Capitol, the part about him knowing they were chanting for the death of the VP, and his own subsequent statements about the VP.  They guy was trying to overthrow the election with violence. The end.[/quote]

I don’t think that’s right. There were definitely two others, one named, the other the limo driver. If one part of her testimony is in question by SS, then the rest can’t be trusted either. Furthermore, they would have arrested Trump long ago on solid evidence, if they had it. The committee would not be necessary. [/quote]

No.  Her testimony was that Ornato told her that story in front of Engel.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics