Reply to Josh Duggar arrested and in federal custody

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Josh Duggar arrested and in federal custody"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

And historically speaking, this severing of the maternal instance thanks to cultural conditioning is pretty common. Think femicide in China, Spartan mothers getting happy about their kids dying in battle and letting babies who looked weak be left out to die... I won’t go on because this is depressing.

[b]Anyway, she should be held accountable[/b], because cultural conditioning is a reason but not an excuse, but I wouldn’t assume that she actually could have made different choices. [/quote]

Accountable for what, and by whom?

[/quote]

She was the only other adult who did not protect her kids. Child services will take them away. She should be in jail. She knowingly had more children with a known child molester. [/quote]

There is absolutely no indication that Josh Duggar's kids were ever in danger.   [/quote]

Well, they were living with someone who had a record of sexually abusing children in his own family, so there’s definitely a chance they were in danger. [/quote]

People (Anna) can't be prosecuted because "there is a chance" something might have happened.[/quote]

PP. Of course not. I’m simply pointing out that PP is wrong - there’s obviously reason to believe those kids might have been in danger.

[b]But also we simply don’t know what she did or saw or knew. We have no idea. It’s possible she had some criminal involvement with what he may have done. Even if not, if she knowingly allowed them to live with a father who sexually abused them, she could indeed lose custody.[/b] [/quote]

Yes, and we here at DCUM simply don't know what YOU have done or seen or have known.   We have no idea.   It's possible that YOU have had some criminal involvement in what YOUR spouse may have done.   Even if not, if YOU knowingly allowed them to live with a parent who sexually abused them, YOU could indeed lose custody.

So please, give us your full name, and your spouse's full hame, so we can imagine all sorts of charges against you, and "hold you accountable" for what could potentially have happened, with no proof. [/quote]

Let me help you out. Here’s the difference: I didn’t marry and then stay with a man who molested his sisters or any other young girls, and my husband wasn’t just arrested for child porn.

But yes, any parent who [b]knowingly[/b] allows their children to be sexually abused could lose custody. Even women who were in cults or whatever. [/quote]
This word is not yet founded.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics