Reply to Thread for Derek Chauvin trial watchers?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Thread for Derek Chauvin trial watchers?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Is Court TV basically a Fox outlet?  That's the impression I'm getting.  It may be because I am, indeed, not a lawyer.  So I can understand the state wanting to show multiple experts stating that this is not an appropriate use of force.  Apparently, "cumulative" evidence is multiple people saying the same thing without adding to the discussion?  So hence the defense objects to repeat experts all stating this is not an appropriate use of force.  But, surely the multitudes of experts willing to testify to that, is itself evidence. It's not one person says this, but another person says that.[/quote]

It’s an issue because it could bias the jury to lend credibility to the repeated testimonies rather than the content of the testimony.

This case is somewhat of an anomaly for a few reasons. But there are valid reasons for a judge to limit testimony to the most relevant experts or witnesses. [/quote]

today's cardiologist expert wasn't particularly compelling either. his demeanor was odd if not condescending.

the same limitations will apply to defense witnesses when it is their turn. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics