Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Hat tip to Trump for his unassailable SCOTUS pick"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]And if they aren't trying to delay, why are Rs fussing about having provided documentation when they've provided <10% of the documentation of the type that was provided on prior modern justices? Come on.[/quote] Meant, if they aren't trying to rush.[/quote] Another BS claim. Over 1 million pages of documents have been provided regarding Kavanaugh. Senators reviewed about 182,000 pages of documents on Gorsuch and about 170,000 pages on Kagan. The Democrats are looking to delay - first, requesting documents that have no relevance to his judicial decisions or work, and then, no doubt, to claim they don’t have time to review any additional documents. It isn’t going to work. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/07/31/senate-digs-through-record-1-million-pages-documents-kavanaugh/864516002/ [/quote] And that absolute number of documents only represents a small proportion of what is out there. Why should he be held to a different standard than previous modern justices, whose histories have been reported in full?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics