Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]It doesn’t make any sense for the blake bot but to be arguing about nudity, what Sony flagged as strange was that Blake was not asking for scenes with nudity to be deleted. She was explicitly asking for all the dailies to be destroyed. The reason ange thought it was strange, because never in her decades long career has she seen someone request dailies to be deleted when there was no nudity. So please, post seven more paragraphs about nudity in the film that you clearly haven’t seen or don’t know anything about. What Ange was explicitly talking about in that email exchange to other Sony executives, was the shock and strangeness of Blake’s request. We will say it again because it’s clear that you are slow. When Blake was asked about this in her deposition, she denied it. We now have a paper trail that proved that she did. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
