Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Clearly, Sony was concerned about her request to destroy dailies, they literally needed to check the policy. It was not run of the mill, there was confusion around it, and Ange has had a long career and has stated she’s never seen anything like this.

But oh maybe she was just talking out of her ass? That makes absolutely no sense. She’s been really professional throughout this whole ordeal and really tried to be in the middle and placate everyone especially lively.

Further, when Blake was asked about this, she lied about it. It’s just really as simple as that.

Vanzan among other things was a reason that they settled so quickly for so little. They had no idea the public was going to find out about it, because this was supposed to end when the New York Times article dropped. We have proof of the text between Ryan blake and Taylor. It’s over… never seen anyone be uncanceled so fast, etc.

They were done and ready to celebrate. Blake was on target to attend the Super Bowl with Taylor. Then a couple weeks later everything changed. Immediately Vanzan received a ton of backlash, even among people who couldn’t have cared less about this case or these celebs, but were appalled at the ethics and wanted to educate the public about its implications.

Vanzan is going to continue to come up and plague Blake with bad headlines because the Joneswork case is just heating up, and VanZan plays a critical role in that case.

To act as if it is a nothing burger is disingenuous. You are not fooling anyone.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics