Reply to ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am the PP who posted the predictions.  The reason I placed the 2011s  where I did is primarily because this forum reported that Union has a majority of players on next years FVU team.  That is, the weaker team has a majority of players on the new team.  This forum also reported that a Brave player and a Union player are going to Arlington and because that is a top team I presumed those two players are strong and would be a loss to FVU.  This forum has also reported more Union players leaving than Brave players but I didn’t take this into account since Union is the weaker team.

Second, I looked at goal differential which puts Brave at 8th and Union at 10th.

Third, looking at the standings and goal differential numbers it looks like Arlington and Charlotte are the clear 1 and 2, followed by a pack of VDA, Courage, Richmond, and Beach (based on GD maybe Courage underperformed?)  After that there seems to be a gulf to 7th place.

If I have overlooked some data please write in, but sentimential statement like “we hope for the best” or “stop trashing FVU” misses the point of my post which is really trying to be objective and data based.  Not trying to offend anyone.
[/quote]

Did you apply this logic with very specific  “data” to the other age groups? You combed through this 300+ page post and grabbed all the relevant “data” and applied this to each team?

Or perhaps a bone to pick with the 2011 team for obvious reasons? GD was the only actual data you used and even that is flawed when not factoring in injuries. [/quote]

goal differential actually says a lot. Especially among teams with similar records. 
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics