Reply to IAC Lacrosse

Forum Index » Lacrosse

Reply to "IAC Lacrosse"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]LOL.  They played Hill, BL and McDonogh.  Yeah, those are cupcakes.

Notice you didn't credit them for having great talent.  Best attack in the country this year, and only Gonzaga could argue to have better talent overall.

Love that purple kool aid.[/quote]

Wow, your reading comprehension skills mirror that of well, a Bullis student. I alluded to Hill and McDonogh in my comment about their early schedule. Neglected to mention BL, sorry. I didn't say they didn't play anyone good. All I said was their schedule had a number of softies on it - and funny how LaxPower agrees. It was smart scheduling. Nothing wrong with that. But to pretend they had the hardest schedule in the DMV is a joke. I get it Bullis fans: you win so infrequently you don't know how to do it properly. But don't get your panties in a bunch simply because someone points out the obvious, namely that Bellistri mixed a number of easy W's into the schedule to rest his starter's legs. SSSA would have been wise to do the same. It was a smart move, especially for that attack you reference which lost some depth in mid-April or so. But we don't need to discuss how that happened, do we?

And again, no Gonzaga affiliation at all outside of being tight w some alums, although I was at the Bullis v Gonzaga game. Watching them put on a clinic v Bullis was impressive. [/quote]

The kid who was kicked out played midfield, not attack.  Not a Bullis supporter, but Gonzaga benefits every year playing a ton of cupcakes (i.e. the entire WCAC).[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics