Reply to SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This "reporter" also broke the story of "losers and suckers"[/quote]

He has receipts, i.e., actual screen shots of the messages. He didn’t chase the story – – he was added erroneously to the chat. What don’t you understand about that?[/quote]

He also could have done what I have done at work when I have received something I should not receive and that is to contact someone and say I believe I received this by accident. No he is thinking he will get a book or a million speaking engagements. I am sure also exaggerating as well. Sad.[/quote]

Why don't you apply that reasoning to the actual natsec people on the chat?[/quote]

I stand by what I said. We live in a world where this kind of mistake can happen and you learn from it. I have definitely received emails and sometimes emails at the bottom say if you received by accident you need to erase and contact sender. I have done this and can even recall a time someone said something I didn’t appreciate and it was an awkward call. The dumb thing is this reporter could have done this and built a reputation as a stand up person instead of being so partisan. 
[/quote]

Stop gaslighting. This mistake could not have happened if they were following protocol. None of this should be on Signal or on personal phones or include someone who was in Moscow at the time or include stupid emojis or copy-paste top secret details from a secured source to an unsecured phone to be shared on a group chat. [/quote]

Whos uses a random work chat thread as an analogy for classified information/a national security discussion?

We all know people are fallible and mistakes happen. This is why the smart people, long before Trump, set up a system where this particular mistake CAN NOT happen if you just follow the rules.

All the Trump apologists who trying to claim "innocent mistake"... you look so naive and ignorant. This is not how intelligent people operate. This is not how professionals do their job. There are processes in place to prevent mistakes. If your people choose to ignore them, IT IS NOT AN INNOCENT MISTAKE. Nothing innocent about it.

They should all be fired and never hired again.[/quote]

You know who uses it as an analogy? Some loser on DCUM who imagines she's just like those careless drunks who group chatted the reporter - or that her spouse is. So of course they're the ones she's empathizing with here. Whom amongst us isn't a drunkard Sec of Defense with a sloppy group chat planning a war by text because he and his buds don't want to go into the office?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics