Reply to ENCL Nationals

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "ENCL Nationals - Girls"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]U13 and U14 age mean nothing. U15 only good for a very very select few. You all need to grow up. Any of the teams spoken of can completely fall apart or completely turn it around before U16. Seen both happen. These girls aren’t fully grown until U16 and some even later.

I can guarantee you some of these U13/U14 girls are not going to be dominant when they are older. Happens every year here though. Parents of the U12/U13/U14 talking championships, college, etc and two years later the poor kid is 5’1”, skinny, and gets pushed off the ball by bigger defenders and somehow still tries to ball hog because little Sally still thinks she is a star. Some teams will have 3 or 4 of these players and the team goes from being one the best to well, pedestrian. This isn’t even bringing in the who ACL aspect.

Remember Arlington 08s? Went from 1st to almost last in one year. Bethesda 08s were at the bottom 2 years ago. Loudoun 08s used to be below Arlington and not that good. Brave 08s were winless 2 years ago I think. VDA 09s were bad two years ago. Could go into older ages but I don’t think many of you would know.

My best advice to you is to raise your kid as an unselfish team player. Selfish players who YOU think look good are not from a College Coach view point. Those are a dime a dozen. It’s the players that have high energy combined with high IQ that make everyone around them better, that is what your DD should be striving for. 
[/quote]

2009 age group is a good example where Bethesda and Pipeline were amongst the best teams in the country a U12 and U13 but have fallen off a cliff.[/quote]

I remember Pipeline 2009 being a kick and chase team with the GK feeding the biggest, fastest girl on the field so it's no surprise they started to get caught when tey moved to 11v11.  [/quote]

And BSC 09 was only good because of the 2010s playing up and later the 2008 trapped players.  
They haven't won more than a few games since the trapped help left.  [/quote]

Bethesda 09s were 1-13-2 in ECNL and a combined 0-6 in Jeff Cup and Premier Cup.   It looks like last year they only had one win after the trapped 08s left.  [/quote]

Can anyone name one Bethesda team that hasn’t dropped off significantly in the older age groups?  Bethesda older teams make Arlington older teams look great.  [/quote]

As far as Bethesda goes.

06s were good and finished 3rd. Arlington finished 6th. Only one team is selected for playoffs in that age group. Many more top school commits than Arlington.

08s have only gotten better. Finished 1 point out of playoffs. Just won North American ECNL cup. Arlington went from 1st to almost last and did not even qualify for Seattle.

09s have pretty much a completely new team and a new coach next season. Arlington had a better record but did not qualify for Seattle either. Not a big difference between the two especially since the North Atlantic is the tougher region for the 2009 age group. Two teams from NA moved through to finals while zero moved through from MA.

10s are returning to Nationals for a 2nd year and aren’t falling off. Arlington finished 11th.

No matter the club, seems a lot of parents come here to gaslight and post false information. It’s really sad some of you sink to this level.[/quote]

What false information?

You skipped over the 07s who went from one of the top teams in the country four years ago to bottom three in the conference this season.  They have gotten worse.

The 08s made the playoffs last year and didn't qualify this year after a season with only five conference wins so they haven't 'gotten better' by winning the NIT tournament.  They have gotten worse.

The 09s only lost one game last season with the trapped 08s and only won one game the rest of the year and followed that up with a one win season this year.  They have gotten worse.

The 2010s haven't even started HS yet so they're not part of the 'older age group' discussion yet.

You can spin it how you like, but the facts don't lie and nobody is spreading false information.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics