Reply to OJ simpson Died

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "OJ simpson Died"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]For people who have spent any time as victims or with victims of domestic violence, this case was cut and dried. OJ beat his wife and then finally killed her and Ron Goldman, who was in the wrong place.

They were victims who were then dragged through the mud by the press and all the armchair lawyers and forensic pathologists like the people on this thread. They could not speak for themselves because he stabbed them to death so other people killed them again.

How the case turned out is immaterial to the fact that he did it.

[/quote]

It’s not cut and dry. That’s  circumstantial  which can’t be used to convict . Only forensic evidence matters. There was no forensic evidence that linked Scott Peterson. He was convicted simply because he had an affair and told his AP his wife was gone .

No forensics found in his home, warehouses, or boat to prove Scott had a struggle and killed his wife in those places  .

As for the case with OJ,  the forensics here are questionable due to the EDTA found and the lead detectives racial motivations /sentiments . Also, the timeline doesn’t add up either. Catching a limo and boarding a flight 15 minutes after hacking two people to death would be impossible. He would be leaking their blood/leaning a trail everywhere he moved yet the Bronco and limo weren’t washed for blood and O.J. had wall to wall carpet in his bedroom in his home . No blood stains found there either.

Nicole and Oj’s contentious divorce/relationship  doesn’t prove anything about the murders. Lots of divorced couples get into fights about the kids or anything else . That doesn’t mean one killed a person. Nicole wouldn’t have told O.J. about sleeping with Marcus Allen or about her dating life if he was possessive or jealous over her. OJ wouldn’t have befriended and invited the kids’ babysitter/Nicole’s male friend Kato Kaelin (a straight man) to live in his guest house if he was a jealous guy. [/quote]
Circumstantial evidence can be used to convict. If the evidence is admissible, whether it’s direct or circumstantial, you can use it to convict. They had lengthy pre-trial hearings in this case about the admissibility of the prior DV incidents. There is case law about being able to use such evidence to establish motive. People don’t need a law degree to have an opinion on this case but you’re presenting things as facts when you are actually taking out of your @ss. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics