Reply to Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Pretty interesting how the strict constitutionalists have decided they would rather ignore this part of the constitution and the “voters should decide.”  For some reason they don’t take the same position on the many other anti-democratic parts of the constitution.[/quote]

No, it's not interesting at all. You've made a bunch of false assumptions and twisted definitions (and the Constitution).  SCOTUS will hand your head to you.[/quote]

DP. A person isn't entitled to hold office as President if, having taken an oath to support to support the Constitution of the United States, engaged in insurrection against it. Trump took a Presidential oath, and he tried to use violence to take control of the government so he could retain the office to which he was no longer entitled. What's your argument:

1. He didn't take an oath?
2. Using violence to overthrow the government isn't "insurrection?"
3. The office of President isn't an "office?"

Why are you so eager to have this ineligible person back in office?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics