Reply to Cheh's Ward 3 ANC Gerrymandering

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "Cheh's Ward 3 ANC Gerrymandering"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]What's happened to the Cleveland Park - what do we call them? NIMBYs? Ruling class? They were a force to be reckoned with back in the day. Now they are losing everything they would have won a decade ago. I guess either the times they are a changin, or maybe it's that they never had any organized pushback like they have now. This whole thread - the lashing out and attacks - they've become a bit of a spectacle.  And not just here. There was that nutty lady at the council redistricting hearing talking about dark money. And the signs that reminded everyone of "stop the steal." It's all just very sad.

It seems like the same 15 or 20 people that have been around forever. Where's the next generation of CP anti-change people?[/quote]

So ironic that you reference “stop the steal” when the task force member who pushed the neighborhood split (and is part of the Smart Growth lobby) is so connected to Trumpworld, the national GOP and even Russian meddling in Ukrainian politics.  And it’s worth noting that CP Smart Growth has been exposed as a non-transparent, [b]astroturf group[/b] formed by a political consultant.  It’s basically [b]the same handful of people retweeting each other’s posts in an echo chamber and meeting over beer and wings at Nanny O'Briens[/b].  They have had some political success, to be sure.  When one works with Manafort and the guy who did the Willie Horton ad, you learn to play an aggressive game.[/quote]

The wings at Nanny's are good, so I'll give them credit for that. But if it is such a small echo chamber, why are they winning? If most people don't agree with them, it would seem no amount of retweeting each others tweets would be very effective. "Astroturf" implies there is no grassroots support, which I think has been disproven in a pretty compelling way given the engagement we've seen for things like the Macklin, the last ANC election, Connecticut Ave lane study, support for more CT Av density. There are actually a lot of residents that agree with them.  And I think this continued succession of defeats is contributing to this truly bizarre level of person attacks that have nothing to do with redistricting or any of these other issues. What I don't see is the next generation of residents that will wage the battles to preserve the status quo, so maybe we are nearing the end of an error.[/quote]

The people coming up WANT bike facilities, WANT walkable neighborhoods, WANT affordable housing WANT diversity, WANT a car free or car light means of living. There simply aren't more entitled boomers who want the 1950's ideals anymore.

Good riddance.[/quote]

I’ll bite. Since you deleted those previous posts: happy for you to densify Wisconsin and Connecticut and support bike paths etc, and frankly it will add up to gentrification. You can’t do anything about SFHs because we are protected. So we get the best of the both worlds. The only issue is that with redistricting and being called NIMBYs we have no incentive to engage with you and will let you get at each other for little gains. Meanwhile our houses will just go up and there’s maybe 2 “grey hairs” on my entire leafy street. Children are moving in and many of us younger people made money and bought. So you ignore us at your own peril [/quote]

If you think Ward 3  is going to be gentrified, then I don't think you understand the meaning of the word in context.

And only the site owner can delete posts. I have no idea what posts were deleted.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics