Reply to SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SCOTUS: oral arguments for Dobbs v. Jackson (MS abortion case)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So you knew this was coming, right?

https://www.texastribune.org/2021/12/02/texas-ban-medical-abortion/[/quote]
The cruelty is the point. [/quote]

They’ll be after birth control next. They consider it abortive.

“Why can’t you use a condom?” 
[/quote]

I am not a Roman Catholic but isn't the "no birth control" dictum because this would stop children from being conceived.  As the RCC has ways been controlled by men, then it's men controlling women who produce the children their pedophile priests can molest
  Anyone, male or female, who is pro-life should have to give 20% of their income to support all these unwanted babies whose mother's choose to keep them.  And, as long as we're deciding about women's bodies then we should also have laws about men who impregnate a woman who is not his wife and castrate them and all men after impregnating their wife three times.  I want laws against men as draconian as they are for women.[/quote]

It’s about birth control being abortive. That’s how it works. The fertilized egg isn’t allowed to attach to the uterine lining. Conception still occurs.
If life begins at conception, then birth control is an abortion. 
Why can’t the babies be adopted out?
Why can’t you use a condom?
They want the woman’s control removed from the equation and “life at conception” does exactly that.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics