Reply to J.K. Rowling’s post on trans-identity and modern misogyny

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "J.K. Rowling’s post on trans-identity and modern misogyny"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
NP, and I've read your responses, and they just don't hold together.  You seem to take it as a given that it would be too confusing to advocate for women if you have to account for trans women in the definition, but you don't explain why it would be confusing, or how, or give any examples.  And it isn't as obvious as you seem to think.[/quote]

DP.

For a biological woman, having or not having a period can be a serious thing. If we reduce women to "menstruators" we hide that issue. A young woman who's gotten to be age 16 or 17 without having a period may well assume she's just not a menstruator. She may have no idea that's an issue she should bring up with a medical professional. Girls and womens health concerns are undervalued. We are ignored from research to implementation. [b]And now we're supposed to avoid centering womens health and health issues, because a tiny minority of people might possibly have to deal with the fact that their biology is different from the biology of people they'd like to align themselves with[/b].

We don't avoid pushing for prenatal care because of a minority of women who can't get pregnant - even when it causes them serious distress to deal with this knowledge. Why? Because making sure women have access to care before and during pregnancy is critical to the health of those women and the resulting infants. But perhaps we should prioritize women who are dealing with infertility, and just leave it to all other women to make sure they know exactly what they'll need, and that they're effective self-advocates. [/quote]

No one is saying anything of the sort.  We can talk about more than one thing at once.  We can advocate for women's health and health issues, and we can include trans women, just like we include women who have had hysterectomies.  And just like we advocate for health professionals to actually listen to black women's pain even though that isn't an issue that generally affects white women.  We can hold more than one thought in our head at once. We can do all of those things. It's actually quite easy: just don't be a d!ck.  As it were.[/quote]

Not PP but if you can hold more than one thought in your head, shouldn't it be fairly easy to think about women's issues and trans-women's issues as 2 different things? 
Why are you advocating that thinking these are 2 different things is hateful rhetoric??
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics