Reply to Metro United

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "Metro United"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don’t see how getting rid of a pro team affiliation will help.  The problem with this club wasn’t large roster sizes.  It was the quality of the players, because there is no feeder system and the coaching wasn’t very good.  These guys look asleep during games.  So now they are going to reduce their roster size with the same players who lost all the games last year.  I doubt dropping a few girls from each roster will make a difference.  You are just playing your starters (who couldn’t win games anyway) for a longer time.  Unfortunately the DA is not the place to learn the fundamentals of how to play soccer.[/quote]

Because the Pro Club ownership was mandating large roster sizes for revenue. There was no requirement or oversight regarding quality control of player selection.

[/quote]

You all pretend the pro affiliation wasn’t a draw. That’s the funniest part. You all paid out the a$$ so your daughters could wear that jersey and you could tell everyone she plays in a “pro academy”. [/quote]

Nobody said it wasn't a draw initially but the Pro Club offered very little in substantial support for the DA. The Pro Club mandated large rosters which allowed non-competitive players spots and those spots did get playing minutes.

Trimming the rosters says that the club, moving forward, will at least focus training and game minutes on core players which should yield some positive progress moving forward. This does not mean that there will not be a talent gap but it will not be as drastic as a FCV starter against a already poor clubs 27th best player. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics