Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The Blake bot still does not understand that the judge is REQUIRED to assume that Blake’s evidence is true when deciding a motion on the pleadings or summary judgment.  Imagine thinking that was the same as them being true.  No, sweetie, Blake chose to settle before the fact finders actually determined whether or not she was lying.[/quote]

Baldoni/Wayfarer admitted most likely f what she alleged happened. They just argued that in context, it wasn't legally SH. The number of details the two sides disagreed over is actually pretty small, and in many cases the disagreement is simply Blake alleging a detail and the involved people on Wayfarer's side saying they don't remember or answering a slightly different detail. This is normal in a case concerning interactions between several people, people remember differently.

The only people who we know lies in this case were Jed Wallace and Melissa Nathan, who were both proven to have lied in their depositions when Katie Case's emails were deemed admissible and proved they had lied. In her depo, Nathan even expresses surprise that Case's email has been admitted, revealing she lied intentionally, presuming it couldn't be disproven by an email she assumed was privileged.

Meanwhile Lively sat for hours if tough questioning in her depo and they didn't "catch" her in anything like this. Her testimony was consistent and truthful. [/quote]

She perjured herself in her deposition. Keep up. Maybe one of the many reasons there was a last-minute settlement. She went around Sony asking them to delete the dailies. Sony had proof in an email exchange that they have never seen anyone request destroying the dailies and ever in their career when it didn’t have to deal with nudity. Blake was asked point blank if she did this and she said no.

Come on guys. It’s been over a week. No celebrity has come out and said anything. No walks with Taylor even though she’s been in New York doing a pap walk every freaking night. None of the sisterhood of the traveling pants sisters, sending her love for all she’s been through.

It’s over. This was a massive waste of time and money. 
[/quote]

Blake had a request in her nudity rider that dailies from scenes where she was performing nudity and/or intimacy would be deleted. Regardless of what Ange Giannetti said in one email one time, this is actually not atypical, especially for an actress who has been in the business long enough to understand the risk of letting those dailies float around. Especially in the age of AI. Blake did not personally make this request (it was in her contract and her lawyers/agent sought to enforce it, which is their job). Ange rolling her eyes at it is in keeping with Ange being hands off and not wanting to do anything related to this production while also kissing the butt of whomever she is speaking to at the moment. Blake did not perjure herself.

Meanwhile, Jed Wallace and Melissa Nathan were asked directly if they had performed certain actions for clients, including building take-down websites of others at the request of a client, and they said no, and then were confronted with Katie Case's emails clearly showing they'd done exactly that. And Melissa Nathan's response was "I thought that was privileged" meaning she thought she could lie under oath without being caught because she believed Case's emails couldn't be admitted into testimony. So she's unethical AND stupid.

But do go on.[/quote]

Saying Blake didn’t purge herself and lie because Jed Wallace did something unethical doesn’t make any sense.

But further, the Sony executive said they’ve never seen anything like it in their career. Normally dailies are asked to be deleted when there is nudity. They Specifically pointed out that she was asking for dailies to be deleted where there was no nudity. What don’t you understand?

Blake settled this case for no money and NDA. She had no leverage. She was absolutely desperate. Baldoni, who she was absolutely obsessed with, is going to go on making tens of millions of dollars off the story while she owes tens of millions to PR firms and lawyers.

Your side lost. I would recommend just getting over it and moving on. People are likely going to continue to keep this thread alive with the train wreck that is Ryan and Blake’s failing careers. [/quote]

You may have noticed that there was a debate between Blake and Wayfarer about what constituted nudity on this movie. Ange Gianetti took the position that the film had no nudity at all -- her comment was that she had never before been asked about destruction of dailies for a movie with "no nudity." But if the movie had no nudity, then why was Blake asked to sign a nudity rider at all? Obviously there was some nudity in the movie, filmed if not shown on camera, and Blake's team correctly sought to enforce the clause in her nudity rider regarding destruction of those dailies after the film's release. Gianetti's comment about "I've never seen this before" was clearly premised on an apparently incorrect belief that there was nudity in the film. Gianetti was not directly involved in the production of the movie, she was an exec at the distributing studio.

Just because you feel like your side "won" (despite having their entire countersuit dismissed, losing their case against NYT, and Wayfarer having no major projects in development, and various Wayfarer parties still being subject to not only the pending 47.1 motion but also the Jones v. Abel suit as well as now multiple lawsuits that have sprung out of the discovery in Lively v. Wayfarer pertaining to the professional conduct of Nathan, Wallace, and Freedman) doesn't mean I have to agree to things that are false. As long as this thread is alive I will continue to weigh in, if only to correct the lies posters like you seem so eager to spread here for some mysterious reason.[/quote]

Wayfarer has projects in development, including ones with Gabrielle Union and Alicia Keys. You don’t know what you’re talking about and none of what you said makes sense. The dailies had nothing to do with nudity. Blake was just trying to destroy evidence left and right. She’s just too much of a moron to know that Wayfarer would have a back up.

It’s truly amazing how stupid she is. thank God they have so many nannies and help. It’s a wonder she’s able to get around in the world at all. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics