Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The Blake bot still does not understand that the judge is REQUIRED to assume that Blake’s evidence is true when deciding a motion on the pleadings or summary judgment.  Imagine thinking that was the same as them being true.  No, sweetie, Blake chose to settle before the fact finders actually determined whether or not she was lying.[/quote]

Baldoni/Wayfarer admitted most likely f what she alleged happened. They just argued that in context, it wasn't legally SH. The number of details the two sides disagreed over is actually pretty small, and in many cases the disagreement is simply Blake alleging a detail and the involved people on Wayfarer's side saying they don't remember or answering a slightly different detail. This is normal in a case concerning interactions between several people, people remember differently.

The only people who we know lies in this case were Jed Wallace and Melissa Nathan, who were both proven to have lied in their depositions when Katie Case's emails were deemed admissible and proved they had lied. In her depo, Nathan even expresses surprise that Case's email has been admitted, revealing she lied intentionally, presuming it couldn't be disproven by an email she assumed was privileged.

Meanwhile Lively sat for hours if tough questioning in her depo and they didn't "catch" her in anything like this. Her testimony was consistent and truthful. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics