Reply to New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]here is a good write up

https://x.com/ImYouthSoccer/status/1934993185220030560/photo/1[/quote]
That's a writeup on D1 only.

Theres DII, DIII, NAIA, and NJCAA.

Just another example of iamsoccer cherry picking their completely Anonymous count of what they've found trolling insta + X.[/quote]

I see a lot of complaints about this data, but no one arguing in favor of GA's performance provides any hard data or actual evidence that the data is wrong or that GA is outperforming ECNL. Where is the counter evidence to support the claims that this is cherry picked or missing important GA successes?

Just by basic math, there are 347 D1 women's soccer teams, c. 8300 players, or 2000+ slots a year in D1 alone. With that perspective, the only data offered in support of GA's performance--700 commits in one year across all divisions--is not very compelling. GA folks are arguing that there has been a regime change. The burden is on them to show it with actual evidence, not just complain about other evidence.[/quote]
Again, theres Theres DII, DIII, NAIA, and NJCAA.

GAs "burden" is to show the number of commitrments every year. Which they provide. (ECNL does not. Wonder why?)[/quote]

GA shows the commits every year bc they are trying to make an argument and think they have something to prove. ECNL doesn’t think it has anything to prove. Maybe if GA becomes more of a threat than it has so far, it will. Right now the primary thing going for GA is pressure from the boys side, not anything inherent in what GA is offering except freedom to go MLSN.[/quote]
That's like saying "we're so good that we dont need to keep score". Sorry doesn't make sense. Hiding information isnt a good look.[/quote]

Do you actually believe that is the class of 2024, ECNL had fewer than 700 commits across D1, D2, D3, etc.?

Imyouthsoccer points to nearly 700 D1 commits in the class of 2026 just from the top (for placement) 53 ECNL clubs.[/quote]
Anonymous twitter ecnl coach says ecnl is good. Who would have thought?

Instead of moving the goalposts around just admit that ECNL not posting committment numbers is odd and it seems like theyre trying to hide somehting. Not a good look.[/quote]

Lots of people criticize his post but no one points out anything he said that's wrong. Are there another 40+ GA teams with 10+ D1 commits? Should be easy to find at least a few of them. Was he wrong about any of the listed ECNL teams having 10+ commits? Which ones? If you can refute it, go ahead. Otherwise just sounds like sour grapes.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics