Reply to New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "New Additions to Leagues Check Up (ECNL & GA)"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]here is a good write up

https://x.com/ImYouthSoccer/status/1934993185220030560/photo/1[/quote]
That's a writeup on D1 only.

Theres DII, DIII, NAIA, and NJCAA.

Just another example of iamsoccer cherry picking their completely Anonymous count of what they've found trolling insta + X.[/quote]

I see a lot of complaints about this data, but no one arguing in favor of GA's performance provides any hard data or actual evidence that the data is wrong or that GA is outperforming ECNL. Where is the counter evidence to support the claims that this is cherry picked or missing important GA successes?

Just by basic math, there are 347 D1 women's soccer teams, c. 8300 players, or 2000+ slots a year in D1 alone. With that perspective, the only data offered in support of GA's performance--700 commits in one year across all divisions--is not very compelling. GA folks are arguing that there has been a regime change. The burden is on them to show it with actual evidence, not just complain about other evidence.[/quote]
Again, theres Theres DII, DIII, NAIA, and NJCAA.

GAs "burden" is to show the number of commitrments every year. Which they provide. (ECNL does not. Wonder why?)[/quote]

And many of the GAs 700 aren't D1, so it's even less compelling.  [/quote]
But many are which probably makes you big mad.[/quote]

not really.  80% of GA D1 go to mostly the top 15 teams.  everyone else is begging for NAIA[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics