Reply to Fairfax County GT/AAP Appeals.

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "Fairfax County GT/AAP Appeals. "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Subjective criteria is just that, subject to bias. An iq test is completely objective, and not subject to any bias. Wisc is  best indicator of intelligence. PP, you sound like a parent whose kid is in aap as a result of subjective criteria. My kid is in aap with a 16 GBRS, 99% CogAT and 155 NNAT. Kid is in 6th grade aap, fwiw. As for Wisc, let's just say, again, the 99%. iow, my kid is a 1%er and actually belongs in aap. Most of DCs classmates probably have only average IQs and don't really belong. Wisc 130 plus belong in aap. [/quote]

You need to be more careful when you are creating fictitious data. The current 6th graders were given the NNAT, not the NNAT 2 that is currently used. The highest possible score on the NNAT was 150, so a 155 is impossible.

It's bad enough when people feel like flashing a kid's scores will make them sound more credible, but it's even worse when those scores are completely made up. [/quote

DC is 6th grade, and NNAT was a 155. Not the NNAT2. Actually, DC was given NNAT twice, once in KG and again in 2nd along with the cogat, that is how the process used to be. Now it is NNAT in 1st and cogat in 2nd. Why would I lie about DCs scores? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics