Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "James Van der beek died! 48 yo :("
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I just wish that people would connect the dots that [b]medical bankruptcy[/b] is a real thing and happens to lots of Americans every day. I am too jaded to think this will open a broader conversation about national health insurance or safety nets. Or that that the people who donate to James Van der Beek would also open their hearts to an unnamed destitute family in their own communities. [/quote] Except he had a multimillion dollar home in LA which he redesigned a few years ago (so he had money for that) and I think he rents out for $12,000/month and he has this property in TX. If you'd said he is house poor, I'd get it. If you're saying he suffered from a medical bankruptcy, then I don't think you understand what bankrupt means.[/quote] When did he redesign it? You don’t know if he paid for the renovations with cash or a HELOC. That rental income might be their only source of income. Who knows what the mortgage is, property taxes and maintenance cost. He set his family up with one known source of passive income. If you don’t think their situation warrants a donation or it’s not within your means to do so, don’t give. I didn’t donate but I don’t have a problem with them asking. I am of the mindset that they wouldn’t have asked if it wasn’t necessary. His wife is facing the reality of raising six kids alone. They have publicly stated that they used most of their money to pay for James care. I believe them. Maybe she will ultimately downsize. Maybe she’s trying to get through this awful loss before she focuses on uprooting her kids. Also, it’s a big house in terms of square footage, but it’s five beds and three baths. That’s not exactly an unreasonable amount of space for six kids. [b]As it is all the kids probably share a bathroom which sounds uncomfortable.[/b][/quote] Welp, maybe think about these things before you have six (SIX!) children. My husband grew up in a house of 5 with one bathroom and they made it work.[/quote] What's done is done. Why are you going on and on about it? He wasn't your husband. They are all nobodies.[/quote] Six children is ridiculous unless you are ridiculously wealthy or willing to live very simply. The Van der Beeks are neither, apparently. Hence rattling their tin cup. Embarrassing. [/quote] Ok? Maybe nobody should have any kids because they might die young. What is the right number? 6 is too many so where is the line? What if you have 6 kids and zero prospects and live off the government teat, what then? There are a lot of those people around too. What do you think of them? Should they lose their kids to stop the tin cup rattling?[/quote] The line is the number of children you can comfortably afford, obviously. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics