Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Well that's that. Liman denied WF request. No Swift,[/quote]

It was quite obviously a PR stunt. It does crack me up that WF can drop Swift's name in a filing and it immediately sets off a million online comments, multiple stories in major publications, dozens of Reddit threads. And then it all goes away when it turns out it was just press bait, but they'll do it again and people will react the exact same way next time.

I guess once Pavlov's dogs are trained, you can't undo it.[/quote]

I was amazed at the number of people who were still insisting Swift had agreed even when her lawyers wrote she didn't. It felt like paid shills but at this point I think it's mostly real people wed to a narrative. Once the judge's decision came through, you'd think the biggest news yesterday (on the lawsuits sub) was Perez having a big win.

I went onto some of the Swift subs just to gage reaction. The big one must have banned the topic since there was nothing. The neutral and Swift snark subs generally thought Baldoni and his lawyers were lying. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics