Reply to 2025 IAC and WCAC Playoffs Results and Commentary

Forum Index » Lacrosse

Reply to "2025 IAC and WCAC Playoffs Results and Commentary "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]Love the DC version of the MIAA idea. So what does the Tier 1 Lax look like for this super-conference?
[/quote]

a tier 1 lax division if you were to combine WCAC, IAC and the MAC.

Tier 1:
1. Landon
2. Prep
3. Bullis
4. STA
5. EHS
6. GZ
7. DM
8. SJC
9. GC
10. Ryken

Tier 2:
1. Saint Stephens
2. The Heights
3. BI
4. O'Connell
5. Potomac School
6. Sidwell Friends
7. Saint James
8. Flint Hill

Every 2 years, the AD's come together and if a team or two from the upper wish to drop down from Tier 1 down to Tier 2, or vice versa, do it.

Again this is not hard to establish.

*do Maret or GDS even field varsisty lax teams or is more of rec play*[/quote]
 I think this is a great idea which has absolutely no chance of ever happening in the next 10 to 20 years.

I'm strongly reminded of the current distribution of colleges in the Power Conferences in the NCAA. (Texas in the SEC, Cal and SMU in the ACC, etc., etc.) A couple of 10th graders at lunch could come up with a geographic grouping of schools that would save huge amounts of money, would return regional rivalries, and reduce impact of students.

The reasons this won't happen are pretty much the same as those that would prevent any radical change here in the DMV.

1. Inertia, Sure there are complaints and some minor problems, but there always are. (If it ain't broke ....)
2. No one is in charge Therefore there is no strategic vision.
3. There is no mechanism to do it (At least the colleges have the toothless NCAA)
4. The schools are free agents and act on their short term best interests as the see them.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics