Reply to SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

"I’m sure if he wasn’t a journalist from a failing magazine it wouldn’t be an issue for the felon at all. 😉"

I subscribe to that failing magazine.  Jeff Goldberg will probably get a Pulitzer for his reporting. [/quote]

+1. If he doesn’t deserve one, who does. Especially since this was ethical reporting. Waiting to publish until US troops were safe, redacting the name of the covert operative (something Trump couldn’t be bothered to do with the JFK papers), describing war plans in a high level, general way and not publish specifics. Publishing once it was safe to do so, and not waiting two years to publish it in a tell all book.

This is Watergate and Pentagon Papers level reporting. [/quote]

+1  I'm impressed with him and the Atlantic.  They really did everything right here. There were a lot of things he could have done that would have made him more attackable...[/quote]

I listened to an interview with him. He was very careful about what he told the interviewer about what he read on the chat, expressing discomfort several times with revealing sensitive information (apparently the chat contained specific war plans and names of CIA agents). Notably, he took himself off the chat after the strikes on the Houthis occurred and he realized the whole thing wasn't actually a prank or scam of some sort. And he contacted several WH officials to inform them of the fact that he had inadvertently been included in the chat.

MAGA is just annoyed that these clowns got caught in the act and were publicly embarrassed by Goldberg. Some "patriots"![/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics