Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Kamala Harris for President"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Other than race and identity politics, and trashing Donald Trump, what is Harris running on?[/quote] You can read her website since you clearly have internet access. But to sum up why I’ll be voting for her— she’s running on protecting my right and the rights of my daughters and nieces to access healthcare and not bleed to death in bathrooms or land in the ICU because we’ve been denied basic care.[/quote] How is she going to do that? It's a state-by-state basis after Dobbs, and she as president will have no control over the states that have stripped the rights of your daughters and nieces. She isn't Congress and the president isn't a monarch. What is she going to do? The rights are already stripped - Democrats whom I voted for let that happened when they refused to codify Roe. It's a serious question. How is she going to do that?[/quote] We’re hoping that Thomas and Alito kick the bucket so she can appoint new SCOTUS and change the balance again. [/quote] Her platform is “hope two people die while my party controls the Senate”? You can’t be serious. And, again, as someone who votes for Dems…the conservatives are smart enough to time their justices’ retirements. Unlike RBG. Seriously, for the party of constitutional democracy, pushing through this nominee without an open convention and then making a bunch of empty promises that cannot materialize under the constitution, this is sending quite the message. If you want moderates to stay home in November, this is a great way to do it.[/quote] Like I’ve said, you’ve got the internet, read her website. For me, for my husband, for every parent of a daughter I know, it would be sufficient to vote against Trump to protect our bodies and our children. You want more? Start reading. [/quote] Protect from what? Look at the state of this country and the world after 4 years of democrats running things. [/quote] Losing their mother when a wanted pregnancy goes septic? Losing their fertility when an ectopic pregnancy isn’t treated? Eighteen years of child support for our boys when a college hookup gets pregnant and can’t terminate? And god forbid— a lifetime connection to a rapist if one of our daughters is denied an abortion. Rapists do not lose parental rights. No thank you. [/quote] Nice fear-mongering. Guess this is the most important issue to you. The right to kill a fetus. Most of us are more concerned with the daily challenges that the Democrats have brought to our country. [/quote] NP. Emergencies happen during pregnancy ALL THE TIME. I had an emergency surgery during my first trimester… these laws around abortion make doctors hesitate and keep their hands tied and it’s scary. The fetus can’t have more rights than the mother.[/quote] In which state is abortion illegal when the life of the mother is at risk? [/quote] None but they keep saying it’s about saving women’s life with abortion. An ectopic pregnancy is not the same as abortion at will for no good reason at 5 months pregnant [/quote] And yet here’s your boys in Ohio saying an ectopic pregnancy should be put in the uterus. https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/abortion-bill-suggests-doctors-reimplant-ectopic-pregnancies/ Tell me more about how republicans should be trusted with women’s health.[/quote] In 2018, Harris introduced the “Do No Harm Act,” which aimed to effectively kneecap doctors with religious objections to abortions and transgender mutilations. The Act also sought to punish faith-based schools and charities for their views on birth control. This is awful [/quote] For greater context, the “Do No Harm Act” was intended to protect people from abuses of the “Religious Freedom Restoration Act.”: “The Do No Harm Act clarifies that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act is intended to protect religious freedom without allowing the infliction of harm on other people. It would amend RFRA in order to restore the original intent of the legislation by specifically exempting areas of law where RFRA has been used to bypass federal protections. […] When passed into law over two decades ago, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) was designed to protect minority religious groups' constitutional right to freely exercise their religious beliefs. RFRA prohibits the federal government from “substantially burden[ing]” a person’s religious exercise unless doing so is the least restrictive means of furthering a compelling governmental interest. RFRA was supported by a broad coalition of organizations including many in the civil rights community, who welcomed the law as an important shield from the tyranny of majority rule. Despite this focused, straightforward intent, individuals and businesses have worked to distort RFRA into a blank check to discriminate or to impose their religious beliefs on others. In 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, in which the Justices were asked to decide whether requiring a corporation to provide insurance coverage that includes contraception under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is a “substantial burden” on the corporation with religious objections, and whether corporations are covered by RFRA. The Court ruled that closely held for-profit corporations are exempt from complying with the ACA contraception mandate based on the company’s religious belief under RFRA.” https://www.hrc.org/resources/do-no-harm-act#:~:text=The%20Do%20No%20Harm%20Act,of%20harm%20on%20other%20people. The GOP plans to make their version of Christianity the state religion, everyone else’s beliefs be damned. You can see this in Project 2025. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics