Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Colorado case. To keep Trump off ballot"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Not a trumper, but this ends badly for us citizens overall. Don’t care if Trump is the nominee or not, but you can’t just use courts to weaponize your opponents. Had he been convicted of started an insurrection, I’d be onboard. But this is the worst way to do it. The ones who are ok with this are saying “hey I’m good with losing my rights and losing democracy to vote for who I want”. It has dangerous consequences. Granted, Trump being elected is dangerous in itself. But at least the voters are making that decision. Not a handful of judges. Be careful what you wish for…[/quote] So you are saying that someone who tried to steal an election and foment a coup shouldn't be held accountable under the terms of the US Constitution? May as well ball up the document and toss it in the can.[/quote] You have trouble reading. So I’ll say it again. If he’s convicted, yes, please take him off the ballot. Until then, there’s not much of a case here. You can’t take someone off based on feeling. This is the United States, we have due process. Innocent until proven guilty. Again, I DESPISE Trump. But going about it this way will not end well and only will not only have SCOTUS overturn this, but will also have people who are on the fence, will support Trump. This isn’t difficult to understand. The people cheering for this will have a rude awakening. This isn’t the way to go about this. Convict him first, then do it this way. [/quote] Cites for your legal theory that the 14th Amendment requires a conviction in a criminal case? [/quote] Gee, I dunno. Maybe DUE PROCESS? Maybe that Trump was ACQUITTED at impeachment of insurrection and no one in the capitol on Jan 6th has been charged with insurrection? You really believe 4 judges are going to decide this election for the country? I'm just not seeing it. But you do you. SCOTUS is going to shoot this ruling down. Take that like it's coming from the burning bush. [/quote] How many judges decided the election for the country in 2000?[/quote] I was responding to the person who stated this was a unanimous decision. It was not. I guess you didn't catch that?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics