Reply to Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Jack Smith — Special Counsel for Jan 6 and Mar-a-Lago inquiries"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Reported last night that a witness in the Trump tape (one of the people in the room) stated under oath that Trump did not show classified documents to them. [/quote]
Citation?[/quote]

It was in a news report and similar news reports are now stating that the tape probably won’t be played for a jury. Why not? I mean it’s bombshell evidence sure to take Trump down, right? Am I going to spend hours (due to heavily biased search algorithms looking for that same article where the line was buried way down in paragraphs? No. But you can certainly do so.

They know if the jury hears that tape, the defense will call the witness who testified under oath. So they leaked it instead.

[/quote]
Even if Newsmax did say such a thing, it doesn’t matter because you still can steal classified documents, you still can’t move them from place to place, you still can’t store them outside a SCIF.

You don’t know how any of this works. You thought Hillary was the devil for classified info storage issues (according to your side), but you haven’t seemed to grasp that what Trump did is the equivalent of the pope lifting his skirt, pulling down his underwear and shaking his genitals at the assembled crowd from the steps of St Peters. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics