Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
VA Public Schools other than FCPS
Reply to "Arl Dems Caucus Endorsement - School Board - In the Candidates' Words"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Did anyone else notice that APE's newsletter highlights and lauds the Congressional testimony of the director of an organization that is for channeling public money to private schools and against "radical" CRT and "gender ideology" in public schools? As a reminder APE is the group that Miranda founded and led. It only takes a couple of clicks to see the connection between APE and this right wing group - https://www.arlingtonparentsforeducation.org/enews/april-20-2023/#Hearing https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Gentles-testimony_-The-Consequences-of-School-Closures_-Intended-and-Unintended.pdf https://www.iwf.org/efc/[/quote] Well. APE really walked right into this one. Thanks for highlighting this, PP. Tell us again that you're not a MAGA right wing org, APE! [/quote] Are you serious? I can't stand the IWF, but why wouldn't APE highlight a congressional hearing with bipartisan "consensus that from all the witnesses and Members of Congress that school closures had led to learning loss and negative mental health effects that are still present today, and the fundamental importance of keeping schools open." That's the point of this whole thing, not to promote some rightwinger. They don't control who congress invites as witnesses and they don't even mention her name despite sharing her comments about APE's work. But they do name and draw attention to quotes from two other witnesses. Seems like a fair summary of what happened in a congressional hearing where APE was mentioned. Link to it so others can determine for themselves https://www.arlingtonparentsforeducation.org/enews/april-20-2023/#Hearing [/quote] APE CHOSE to highlight ONE witness from that hearing - the MAJA RWNJ. Very telling. [/quote] You seem to lack critical reading skills. They highlight two witnesses by name and their quotes. The mention this person and 4th witness and do not name them. [/quote] they give top billing to the MAGA one and note favorably that he quotes APE's twitter. Seems like a close connection to me. YMMV. [/quote] NP - MMV, I guess. Seems to me, most people would "highlight" something that quotes or references them/their group.[/quote] I mean if a RWNJ highlighted something I wrote, I would rethink my position. And I certainly wouldn't put it out there as a positive thing. But that's just me, I don't lean the way you do. APE clearly views the endorsement from a RWNJ as a plus. That says it all to me. [/quote] Obviously you "don't lean the way (I) do" because I don't lean. I'm a moderate who is sick of both extreme ends of the spectrum bashing everyone and everything that does not 100% align with their views.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics