Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Gwyneth Paltrow court case"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous]This is obviously all a total setup. There is literally no evidence that he was seriously injured in whatever crash occurred. All the people who are saying that it's more like the injured party is the one who is hit (true), the study cited shows it's like 75% v 25%... I just don't understand how a 3/4ths chance of something = an absolute slam dunk that in a specific case something happened & the vitriol that is accompanying that pronouncement in this thread. Like, yes, with no other facts, it is roughly 3x as likely that the injured person got hit. BUT 25% isn't a tiny percentage that hardly ever happens AND there's lots of evidence his injuries are at least somewhat invented AND he's older/in worse shape (which the study itself says matters) AND his one eyewitness' story is obviously a lie. Given that I just don't see how you could be ABSOLUTELY CONVINCED she definitely hit him just because of the abstract 75%/25% likelihoods.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
