Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Is Ginni Thomas A Threat To The Supreme Court?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][twitter]https://mobile.twitter.com/DanRather/status/1528118437263728642[/twitter][/quote] I’m sure old Dan can just make something up and report it as fact. He’s a joke. [/quote] And I sure wish you had a scintilla of integrity. [/quote] You think the man that resigned in shame has integrity? That says a lot about you. [/quote] What does a justice’s refusal to resign or even recuse himself, despite being significantly compromised, say about him? Dan Rather had enough decency and integrity to have shame.[/quote] And you know he’s compromised how? What’s your proof?[/quote] Why are you posting here if you don’t follow politics or current events very closely and haven’t read this thread or the lengthy article about Ginni Thomas linked in this thread?[/quote] PP is just aSkInG qUeSTioNs. [/quote] It takes a special kind of person to ask this question on page 30 of a thread about the exact thing they’ve asked.[/quote] “Special” is one word for it. [/quote] It takes a special kind of person to hold someone responsible for the actions of their spouse. I guess if your husband cheats on you, you must be a cheater too based on your logic. [/quote] He’s never disabused the notion that he’s in agreement with her. [/quote] He doesn’t have to, that’s not how this works. [/quote] Because there’s no requirement to do so for Supreme Court justices, but every other judge/justice in the land is required to avoid even the mere appearance of impropriety. Go figure.[/quote] Just like Trump showed us all of the ways a POTUS could abuse his power, Thomas is showing us all of the ways to abuse his. We can no longer rely on ethics. We need real consequences for SCOTUS corruption. [/quote] Why is he constantly giving paid speeches to right wing groups who have agendas that may end up in his court? Virtually all the articles that begin with, “Clarence Thomas says…” quote from one of his almost weekly speeches. What an attention whore.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics