Reply to FCPS School Board candidates in Dranesville

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "FCPS School Board candidates in Dranesville"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote]In fact, one of the main goals is to ensure community input before changing boundaries. That is why the moratorium was placed on administrative boundary changes.[/quote]

Not so sure that was going to be significant in the new policy.  Didn't Schultz bring that up in the work session?[/quote]

Administrative boundary changes even for new and unoccupied housing are totally gone in the draft 8130.  100+ houses at 7 and Towlston slated for Spring Hill not nearby under capacity Colvin Run.  FCSB needs scoping, intro meeting, and 3 public meetings on the faciltiies plural options, plus some work sessions and regular meetings?  All that to occur after houses occupied and mega trailers?  Then there's Top Golf becoming residences and that might be n the Edison pyramid.

[/quote]

Not sure that's the right outcome; one would like to think the administrative reassignment of a new development out of an overcrowded school to an under-enrolled school could be done expeditiously.

Unfortunately, when the track record includes using the administrative route to move kids out of an under-enrolled school like Lee to West Springfield (and then getting another similar request from a different group of Lee parents), you can see why Brabrand wanted to change the process.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics