Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Trump wanted to release immigration detainees onto the streets of “sanctuary cities""
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This is about using human beings to “retaliate” and as “political retribution” to send a message to Democrats. Using the lives of other as cannon fire to teach a lesson to dear leader’s political enemies. Not to fix a situation, but to be purely spiteful with people.[/quote] Aren't sanctuary cities where they are SUPPOSED to be? Mont. Co. is one, according to the link upthread. How is it retaliatory to send newcomers to areas DESIGNED to attract them?[/quote] Exactly. Liberals are hypocrites. [/quote] That wasn't WHY they were designated sanctuary cities, but go ahead and send them. [b]That will surely encourage another huge wave of refugees.[/b] [/quote] Ok - now we're trying to wordsmith. Sanctuary cities are INDEED much more hospitable to newcomers. That's a FACT! The availability of resources necessary to provide a comfortable solution for these people is the reason why people come. an added benefit? the ability to track newcomers in case there's another Rockville HS rape incident . . . EVENTUALLY, MOST will report to friendly areas, which translates into sanctuary cities. So you can dance around the definition all you want, but liberals created the rules and now you have to learn to live with them. And I do question what I added in bold. I may be stupid to make an ASSumption, but I'll do it anyway. Is that "threat" one that comes from fear? It appears as though you DON'T want to invite more of "them" in. Am I correct? [/quote] It's not a threat. Just a likely outcome. Would [i]you[/i] consider it a threat? Intentions don't matter, so I'm told. So it's really just how [i]you'd[/i] interpret it, right? [/quote] lol It's NOT a FUTURE outcome. It's already in place. That's what you don't seem to get. [/quote] You don't think that even LARGER groups of refugees will come if they know that Trump is welcoming them into the country? [/quote] DP. LARGER groups are now coming because they know that showing up with children will automatically guarantee them an asylum hearing - but more importantly, it will ensure they're released into the U.S. while they "wait" for that hearing. Asylum laws need to be changed and these groups need to wait on Mexico's side for their hearings - not simply be released into the U.S. It's mind-boggling that Mexico isn't stepping up and holding them there while they wait.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics