Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Paul Manafort Told to Surrender"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][img]https://i.imgur.com/YWuXD9F.png[/img] Ok, folks. This is indictment B. In 30 years of fedral litigation, I have never seen a B level defendant be higher up than an A. Flynn has already been indicted.The next person to go down here will be higher up the chain. Who will it be?[/quote] This is discussed upthread. According to the twitterverse Indictment (A) has to be higher profile criminal that "B". Which can only be Trump, Pence or Sessions. http://www.palmerreport.com/opinion/sealed-trump-indictment/5796/[/quote] Is anyone more credible discussing this? I want to see Trump come down more than anyone but the palmer report isn't much more than a liberal brietbart.[/quote] Indictment A has to be more high profile than Indictment B (Manafort, which is already pretty high profile). The Palmer Report thing analyzes why he thinks it's Trump rather than Sessions (who wouldn't need to have their indictments sealed) or Pence (who he can' not imagine getting indicted without Trump being indicted too.)[/quote] Someone one twitter was saying indictment a vs indictment b spoke more to the level of charge than the number of defendants. I don't see any news media saying this. I'm not saying you're wrong but if you're right why aren't the post/times/cnn etc reporting on it?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics