Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "About time the New York Times exposed the sham marriage [GREAT piece today]"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't understand Trump supporters take on this. If skank shaming is wrong, didn't Trump do this much more recently by trying to discredit Machado's remarks by saying she had been in a sex tape? A few days ago, in 2016, not 1996. I'm sure you will have some rationalization for why a direct statement from Trump in the present day using a woman's sexual history to discredit her charges against him is okay, whereas Hillary is the devil, but it would sure be entertaining to hear it.[/quote] No takers, I see. Just more hypocrisy from the Trump camp who thinks they can have it both ways. I think Clinton is not blameless here, but to me what Trump did was even worse because he is doing this shit now in 2016, and he is saying this stuff himself, in 2016, and not just participating in it twenty years ago. The idea of using a woman's sexual past to discredit the truth of her statements is much more understood as wrong today than it was in 1996. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
